Get your business and economy news from Russia
Provided by AGPMoscow, the analysis suggests, has largely accepted the logic of long-term strategic interdependence. Beijing, however, is still described as operating under the assumption that it can maintain a tightly controlled partnership in which it remains the dominant actor while limiting its own commitments.
The article argues that this approach is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain. For years, Western policy discussions have often framed Russia as the junior partner in the relationship, a view frequently echoed by analysts in Brussels, Washington, and even some Chinese commentators, who describe an arrangement in which Russia provides resources while China supplies broader economic and technological support.
Berlin-based think tank MERICS has characterized the partnership as “fundamentally unbalanced,” while Intereconomics has described it as “symbiotic but deeply asymmetrical.” Other academic assessments of the Russia–China–US strategic triangle suggest that the United States still retains a decisive advantage in overall global influence, according to reports.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.